Dear President Trump,
I am an American Swiss citizen who grew up near Cape Canaveral among the sons and daughters of those who worked on the Apollo Project. Every few months we sat on the warm hoods of our parents‘ cars, watching rockets rise above the tree line, hoping they would pierce the atmosphere without exploding.
Sometimes they didn’t. In our daily lessons we learned and observed firsthand values fundamental to what made America great: innovation, hard work, meritocracy, and fairness.
On April 2, 2025, you declared „Liberation Day“ for America, unveiling sweeping new trade tariffs with a bold vision: to restore American economic sovereignty by correcting „unfair trade practices“ and ending what you described as „decades of foreign nations ripping off Americans.“
Your goals seemed laudable: transforming the United States into a manufacturing powerhouse, reducing trade deficits, and raising revenue to address our national debt. They appealed to the American in me.
I understood your frustration. The trade imbalances are stark and undeniable. How could India charge up to 150% tariffs on American products while we charged them none, all while granting them over 70% of precious H-1B visas—the lifeline of any immigrant seeking opportunity in America?
Who wouldn’t support measures to prevent China from dumping excess steel production or monopolizing rare earth minerals critical to our national security?
The pandemic revealed our dangerous vulnerabilities when Chinese dominance in supply chains hindered production of everything from can openers to life-saving respiratory machines. Many of us felt anxious and exposed.
Tariffs – like all taxes – are constitutionally the responsibility of Congress, reflecting our founding principle that there should be „no taxation without representation.“
I recognized that building consensus among 535 legislators is unwieldy, and when you stated that „fairness“ was your primary motivation, I was prepared, like many Americans, to overlook this constitutional exception.
That goodwill dissipated when I learned of your unilateral imposition of a 39% tariff on Switzerland—almost quadruple the baseline 10% rate and among the highest imposed worldwide.
Switzerland represents everything America should celebrate in a trading partner. The country maintains a balanced trade relationship when both goods and services are considered – and services should count, given they constitute 70% of our economy.
As one of the world’s most open economies, Switzerland imposes virtually no tariffs on U.S. exports, offering the most generous form of reciprocity possible.
Despite its modest population of 8.7 million – smaller than New York City – Switzerland consistently ranks among the top ten investors in America. Swiss companies directly employ over 450’000 Americans across all 50 states, from advanced manufacturing to life-saving pharmaceuticals.
Over the past decade alone, Swiss firms have invested more than $280 billion in American operations, research facilities, and manufacturing plants. Glassdoor consistently ranks Swiss companies among the best employers to work for in America.
These aren’t fair-weather investments – these companies have been building America for over a century, with Nestlé even moving its headquarters here during World War II to escape potential Nazi nationalization.
Roche’s Nutley, New Jersey facility served as a refuge for Jewish scientists fleeing the Holocaust.
Most tellingly, in just the past few months since your inauguration, all three companies have announced massive new American investments despite the tariff threats:
Novartis announced a planned $23 billion investment, followed by Roche’s commitment to invest $50 billion in the U.S. over the next five years, creating more than 12,000 jobs, and ABB’s announcement of a $120 million investment to expand production of its low-voltage electrification products in Tennessee and Mississippi.
That’s over $73 billion in new commitments from Switzerland in your first 100 days alone – compelling actions of a nation striving to contribute to America’s prosperity, not „rip it off“.
The benefits flow both ways. Swiss consumers enthusiastically purchase Netflix subscriptions and iPhones while Americans benefit from ABB’s cutting-edge technology upgrading our electric grid and Roche’s breakthrough therapies keeping cancer patients in remission.
History teaches that when rules are imposed by force rather than fairness, resistance and instability follow. The Boston Tea Party that ignited our Revolution occurred precisely because colonists felt England’s tariffs were arbitrary and unfair – a lesson all American children learn in school.
Your approach, as it stands, threatens the very manufacturing revival you champion. When nations feel they are punished for good deeds, or perceive policies as capricious, they tend to withhold investment or redirect capital elsewhere, undermining American competitiveness and global growth.
Economic growth, like trust, cannot flourish amid uncertainty and arbitrary rulemaking.
Mr. President, few leaders possess your bold vision and ability to reshape global trade to benefit America. Imagine harnessing that strength not through fear, but through clear examples that reward fairness and partnership.
By creating a ‚Most Favored Trading Partner‘ status for nations like Switzerland – who balance trade, keep markets open to American goods, and invest significantly in U.S. jobs – you would set a new standard that others aspire to meet.
This approach would showcase your unmatched leadership in turning competition into a tool for America’s lasting prosperity, inspiring the world to seek your favor rather than avoid your displeasure.
Progress has forever been about finding something that works and encouraging others to emulate.
Respectfully,
An American who still believes fairness made America great.
Dieser offene Brief erschien zuerst in den Tamedia-Medien, siehe Tages-Anzeiger. Der Brief erfolgte nach einem Interview des Tages-Anzeigers mit dem Autor.
Der Schweiz-Amerikaner ist Autor und Gründer der in Zürich beheimateten Investmentfirma Naissance Capital. Im Frühling 2008 wies er zusammen mit Co-Autoren der ETH Zürich in einer Publikation warnend auf die Gefahr eines Kollapses des globalen Finanzsystems hin.
Im Herbst desselben Jahres ging die US-Bank Lehman Brothers in Konkurs, und die UBS musste mit Staatsmilliarden gerettet werden. 2014 warnte er in einer Analyse vor dem Untergang der Credit Suisse.
Breiding wuchs im US-Bundesstaat Florida auf und lebt in Zürich. Er schrieb mehrere Bücher über die Stärke der Schweizer Wirtschaft und ist Gründer der Non-Profit-Organisation S8nations.
Tja, schön Wetter-Schreiber und Wunschdenken. Ob das das orange Genie interessiert?? Der ganze Ami-Club ist KEIN verlässlicher „Partner“ und Freund dies schon lange, er hat nur Interessen! Wann hören wir in der CH mal auf mit diesem Kadavergehorsam? Wann machen wir die richtigen und entscheiden Schritte? Gold, AHV, F35 und und und. Merken wir nicht dass wir vorzu betrogen und verarscht werden. Machen wir das RICHTIGE! In diesem Sinne wünsche ich allen einen guten Start in die Woche
Excellent summary of the economic and political interdependencies between two still sovereign states. Unfortunately, Donald Trump isn’t interested in history and its sequences.
He however, seems to disregard the complexities of historical context and the intricate web of economic and political interdependencies that shape global relationships between sovereign states.“
International Political Economy (IPE) studies these complex relationships, focusing on how politics and economics intersect globally.
Der wohl beste inside Paradeplatz Artikel ever!
Do you honestly think a president who openly declared his ambitions to annex Greenland is interested in fair trade?
Mr. Trump made it blatantly clear that he does not care about Switzerland (or any other country for that matter) – which is fair enough. I hope this will be a wake-up call for our politicians: There is NO SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP between Switzerland and the US.
The best we can do is accept the tariffs (for now), sell our US-Bonds, keep a low profile, renegotiate with the EC (the current contract is not an option) and find export opportunities in other countries.
Beautiful words. Too beautiful, in fact: We can’t complain about India’s 150% when the (still) Swiss pharmaceutical industry adds 200%.
The orange carrot, however, won’t care at all. Firstly, because its attention span is limited to four words at most, and because there’s nothing in this thread that could satisfy its narcissism.
Thank you, Mr. Breiding ! The very best answer to President Donald Trump.
The problem is that trust is permanently destroyed by such despotism. Let’s be honest, America is not a reliable partner and shamelessly exploits its relative strength when it suits them, and America does not even honour existing treaties if they no longer serve their interests. Perhaps Europe and Switzerland should look around for more reliable partners in general. And just as a reminder, Russia honours contracts even when its contractual partners support an enemy in war.
Brilliant!
Man beachte das herausragende Sprachniveau des Artikels.
Übrigens: Wenn Trump sagt „she would not listen“, bedeutet das nicht „sie hat nicht zugehört“, sondern „sie hat nicht auf mich gehört“, sprich „sie hat nicht gehorcht“.
Sehr geehrte Frau Bundespräsidentin
Bitte sprechen Sie nie wieder mit DJT oder seinen Regierungsmitgliedern ohne diplomatischen Beistand, wie z.B. Th. G. Borer. Wichtig ist nicht, was der andere sagt, sondern was der andere meint!
Besten Dank.
Well said ! The push back against the ‚ugly American revisited‘ is worldwide underway -not openly because of the big stick..but it will steadily undermine American and Western interest and play into China‘s hands.
Switzerland is a good example for the US ( maybe starting with Trade Representative) to examine why there is a deficit in US exports to Switzerland : it’s not tariffs or trade obstacles ( except agriculture)or lack of purchasing power. It‘s lack of interest by exporters because of the small market and quality issues.
Why does James R. Breiding contribute? Why him? Look at his career. He has enjoyed life in luxury for decades.
Schön, dass sich J. Breiding selber lobt. Er ist das beste Beispiel eines USA – Unique – Self – Advertisers! Und übrigens, seine Naissance Capital verwaltet seit Jahren keine Assets, macht keine Investments, keine Performance, keine Gewinne und hat keine Mitarbeiter. Vielleicht sollte die FINMA da mal nachschauen, was der saubere Schweiz/Amerikaner hier so tut!? Ein LH-Freund, der protegiert wird?
Die Steuerung der Schweiz durch den Vatikan funktioniert nicht mehr. Nun will die Schweiz in die EU flüchten. Doch damit käme sie vom Regen in die Traufe, denn die EU würde die Schweiz finanziell ausplündern. Die EU hat kein Geld mehr.
Die Schweiz war bisher insofern neutral, als dass sich alle Ganoven der Welt dort sicher treffen konnten.
Die Konzerne verlassen die Schweiz, wodurch das Land verarmen wird.
Die Schweizer werden dann wieder Koffer für reiche Touristen tragen müssen, wie in früheren Zeiten, oder auswandern.
Die Schweiz muss zwecks Erhalt des Wohlstands sowohl mit den USA, der EU und neuen Absatzmärkten faire Handelsabkommen und Staatsverträge abschliessen können. Ein einseitiges EU-bashing bringt nichts. Wir m ü s s e n zu einer fairen Regelung kommen. Die Frage stellt sich wie mit den USA: wir müssen verstehen, was die EU will und uns der besonderen Position der Schweiz – es ist nun als Exportnation eine massive Abhängigkeit – bewusst sein. Aber: sind unsere Verhandler ebenso wenig kompetent wie jene mit der US-Regierung?
Hervorragender Text. Gratulation. Nur: Der Leser im Weissen Haus sollte fähig sein, Fakten zu anerkennen, zu anerkennen, dass er einen Fehler gemacht hat mit seinen 39%, dass er Amerika schadet. Kann er das ? Wir werden es sehen. Kürzlich äusserte sich ein USA-Kenner im Tagi über mögliche Massnahmen unsererseits. Er schlug vor, der Bundesrat solle in wichtigen US-Medien ein ganzseitiges Inserat schalten, der hier vorliegende Text könnte (weitgehend) verwendet werden (ok des Verfassers vorausgesetzt). Ja, weshalb nicht, Frau Bundespräsidentin ?
Herr James Breiding (CH-/US-Doppelbürger) zeigt uns – ohne Mahnfinger – dass eine klare un unmissverständliche Antwort an die US-Regierung AUCH respektvoll sein kann.
Vielleicht – hoffen darf man immer – dass diese Art dem Präsidenten DJT eben doch gefällt und etwas auslöst !
Danke Herr Breiding !
That all sounds well and good, and it’s true.
But how are you going to get that across to the orange moron in the White House and his lackeys?
Ein hervorragend formulierter und faktenreich belegter offener Brief, der aufzeigt, wie Handelsbeziehungen nicht nach Willkür, sondern nach Fairness gestaltet werden sollten. Besonders überzeugend finde ich die Darstellung, dass die Schweiz – trotz ihrer Grösse – seit Jahrzehnten ein verlässlicher Partner der USA ist, massiv in Arbeitsplätze investiert und offene Märkte pflegt. Eine Handelspolitik, die solche Partner belohnt statt bestraft, wäre nicht nur gerecht, sondern auch wirtschaftlich klug.
I’d prefer the release of the Epstein-files.
Hey buddy, thanks for the letter, but I didn’t quite get your point. Something about Apollo projects and Florida’s east coast, and about big pharma, all stirred together with an indication of misunderstood American history, a handful of very Swiss-ish overreaching advice on how I should run my presidency and a lot of I, I, I about you.
Well, try again, and till then: Balance your surplus or get tariffed.
thank you for your kindness
Dear Mr. Breiding, firstly let’s start by this: Donald Trump has just had the best few months of his presidency. No question. No argument. Period, end of paragraph.
Secondly your article, with all its nice rhetoric, appears to me as a thinly disguised rehash of the anti Trump narratives of the likes of the NYT, Wapo, MSNBC, etc., i.e. big bad wolf Trump, poor, innocent, little lamb Switzerland.
Well, the reality is Switzerland is not as white as its snow, by far. Switzerland will go down not because of the naughty US but due to its greediness, pusillanimity and well disguised opportunism.